A Platform for the Implementation of Adaptive On-line Courses: Description and Teachers’ Point of View
Keywords:
Adaptability, Authoring system, Curriculum, AssessmentAbstract
Adaptation is a desirable feature in on-line courses which allows for the consideration of students particular characteristics and needs. However, it is not common for teachers to embrace technologies related to this feature. This phenomenon may be mainly attributed to: a) unawareness of appropriate authoring tools, and/or b) resistance to their use. Regarding this panorama, this research has two purposes. The first purpose is to present a web platform to create adaptive on-line courses that considers three adaptive functionalities: curriculum sequencing, content presentation and assessment. The second purpose is to present a validation for such platform with real users, more specifically, 51 teachers of K-12. The obtained results show that even if there was general distrust while using the platform, there was also a overall interest in rely on a tool that grants teachers in providing an individualized learning experience.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Brusilovsky, P. (2003). Developing adaptive educational hypermedia systems: from design models to authoring tools. En Murray et al. (Eds.) Authoring tools for advanced technology learning environment (pp. 377-409). Dordrecht, Países Bajos: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Brusilovsky, P. y Peylo, C. (2003). Adaptive and Intelligent web-based educational systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13, 156-169.
Chen, C. H., Liu, C. Y. y Chang, M. H. (2006). Personalized curriculum sequencing utilizing modified item response theory for web-based instruction. Expert Systems with Applications, 30, 378-396.
Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E. y Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning, a systematic and critical review. Londres: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
Felder, R. y Silverman, L. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.
Karampiperis, P. y Sampson, D. (2005). Adaptive learning resources sequencing in educational hypermedia systems. Educational Technology & Society, 8(4), 128-147.
Knutov, E., De Bra, P. y Pechenizkiy, M. (2009). AH 12 years later: a comprehensive survey of adaptive hypermedia methods and techniques. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 15(1), 5-38.
Moreno, J., Ovalle, D. y Vicari, R. (2010, Noviembre). Método para la selección de objetos de aprendizaje a partir de características cognitivas del estudiante. Artículo presentado en el 21 Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática en Educación, João Pessoa, Brasil.
Oppermann, R. y Kinshuk, R. (1997). Adaptability and adaptivity in learning systems. Knowledge Transfer, 2, 173-179.
Ponsoda, V. (2000). Overview of the computerized adaptive testing. Psicológica, 21(1), 115-120.
Samuelis, L. (2007). Notes on the components for intelligent tutoring systems. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 4(2), 77-85.
Stash, N. (2007). Incorporating cognitive/learning Styles in a general-purpose adaptive hypermedia system. Tesis de doctorado, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Países Bajos. Recuperado de http://alexandria.tue.nl/extra2/200710975.pdf
Stewart, C., Cristea, A., Brailsford, T. y Ashman, H. (2005, Febrero). Authoring once, delivering many: Creating reusable Adaptive Courseware. Artículo presentado en IASTED International Conference on Web-based Education, Grindelwald, Suiza.
Thissen, D. y Mislevy, R. (2000). Testing Algorithms. En H. Wainer (Ed.) Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 101-134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brusilovsky, P. y Peylo, C. (2003). Adaptive and Intelligent web-based educational systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13, 156-169.
Chen, C. H., Liu, C. Y. y Chang, M. H. (2006). Personalized curriculum sequencing utilizing modified item response theory for web-based instruction. Expert Systems with Applications, 30, 378-396.
Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E. y Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning, a systematic and critical review. Londres: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
Felder, R. y Silverman, L. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.
Karampiperis, P. y Sampson, D. (2005). Adaptive learning resources sequencing in educational hypermedia systems. Educational Technology & Society, 8(4), 128-147.
Knutov, E., De Bra, P. y Pechenizkiy, M. (2009). AH 12 years later: a comprehensive survey of adaptive hypermedia methods and techniques. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 15(1), 5-38.
Moreno, J., Ovalle, D. y Vicari, R. (2010, Noviembre). Método para la selección de objetos de aprendizaje a partir de características cognitivas del estudiante. Artículo presentado en el 21 Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática en Educación, João Pessoa, Brasil.
Oppermann, R. y Kinshuk, R. (1997). Adaptability and adaptivity in learning systems. Knowledge Transfer, 2, 173-179.
Ponsoda, V. (2000). Overview of the computerized adaptive testing. Psicológica, 21(1), 115-120.
Samuelis, L. (2007). Notes on the components for intelligent tutoring systems. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 4(2), 77-85.
Stash, N. (2007). Incorporating cognitive/learning Styles in a general-purpose adaptive hypermedia system. Tesis de doctorado, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Países Bajos. Recuperado de http://alexandria.tue.nl/extra2/200710975.pdf
Stewart, C., Cristea, A., Brailsford, T. y Ashman, H. (2005, Febrero). Authoring once, delivering many: Creating reusable Adaptive Courseware. Artículo presentado en IASTED International Conference on Web-based Education, Grindelwald, Suiza.
Thissen, D. y Mislevy, R. (2000). Testing Algorithms. En H. Wainer (Ed.) Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 101-134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Downloads
-
HTML
-
PDFSPANISH 275
Article abstract page views: 906
Published
2014-10-28
