Multidimensional Scale to Assess Digital Security in Adolescents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2024.26.e06.5992Keywords:
citizenship, digital security, adolescentesSupporting Agencies:
Research support program (ITSON PROFAPI).Abstract
The study examined the psychometric properties of a Digital Security Scale (DSS-A) in a sample of 868 adolescents (460 female, 408 male), made up of 424 early adolescents (M age = 11.84 years, SD = 0.36) and 444 middle adolescents (M age = 13.44, SD = 0.49). The sample was randomly split into two for validation (n = 434) and cross-validation (n = 434) purposes. The results confirmed the fit of a one second-order factor model with four first-order factors (personal data protection, safe relationships, healthy internet use, and self-disclosure). As expected, digital security dimensions were positively associated with parental mediation. Measurement invariance was found in this model by gender and stage of adolescence. Latent mean comparisons showed differences by gender and stage of adolescence. Overall, findings indicate that the measurement model is helpful for measuring adolescents’ digital security behaviors.
Downloads
References
Almanasreh, E., Moles, R., & Chen, T. F. (2019). Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 15(2), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066
Aydın O., Güçlü, M., Ünal-Aydın, P., & Spada, M. M. (2020). Metacognitions and emotion recognition in Internet Gaming Disorder among adolescents. Addictive Behavior Reports, 12, e100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2020.100296
Babaoglu C., & Akman, E. (2022). Participation with social media: The case of Turkish metropolitan municipalities in Facebook. In Information Resources Management Association (Ed.), Research anthology on citizen engagement and activism for social change (pp. 104–125). IGI Global.
Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2019). Factor analysis: Exploratory and confirmatory. In G. R. Hancock, L. M. Stapleton, & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 98–122). Routledge.
Brown, T. A. (2023). Confirmatory factorial analysis. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (2nd ed., pp. 261–276). The Guildford Press.
Casaló, L. V., & Escario, J.-J. (2019). Predictors of excessive internet use among adolescents in Spain: The relevance of the relationship between parents and their children. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.042
Chen, A., Rosli, S. A., Basri, R., & Hoe, C. Y. W. (2022). Investigation of screen time inclination and the accompanying visual and musculoskeletal discomfort in young smartphone users. Trends in Sciences, 19(2), e1753. https://doi.org/10.48048/tis.2022.1753
Chen, L., & Shi, J. (2019). Reducing harm from media: A meta-analysis of parental mediation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 173–193.
Chen, Y. T., Shih, W. L., Lee, C. H., Wu, P. L, & Tsai, C. Y. (2021). Relationships among undergraduates’ problematic information security behavior, compulsive internet use, and mindful awareness in Taiwan. Computers & Education, 164, e104131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104131
Chugh, R., & Guggisberg, M. (2022). Stalking and other forms of dating violence: Lessons learned from You in relation to cyber safety. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(9–10), 6760–6784. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520966674
Curran, M. B. F. X., & Ribble M. (2017). P-20 model of digital citizenship. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2017(153), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20228
Dedkova, L., & Mýlek, V. (2022). Parental mediation of online interactions and its relation to adolescents’ contacts with new people online: The role of risk perception. Information, Communication & Society, 26(16), 3179-3196. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2146985
Emejulu, A., & McGregor, C. (2019). Towards a radical digital citizenship in digital education. Critical Studies in Education, 60(1), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1234494
Fu, X., Liu, J., Liu, R.-D., Ding, Y., Hong, W., & Jiang, S. (2020). The impact of parental active mediation on adolescent mobile phone dependency: A moderated mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, e106280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106280
Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
Furr, R. M. (2018). Psychometrics. An introduction (3rd ed.). Sage.
Gallego-Arrufat, M. J., Torres-Hernández, N., & Pessoa, T. (2019). Competence of future teachers in the digital security area. Comunicar, 61(27), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.3916/C61-2019-05
Gottfried, E. D., Shier, E. K., & Mulay, A. L. (2020). Child pornography and online sexual solicitation. Current Psychiatry Reports, 22, e10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-020-1132-y
Green, S. B., & Yang, Y. (2015). Evaluation of dimensionality in the assessment of internal consistency reliability: Coefficient alpha and omega coefficients. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(4), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12100
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
Hair, J. F., Hult, T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2th ed.). Sage.
Hamza, A., Kumar, M., Anand, N., Marimuthu, P., Thamilselvan, P., Chakraborty, P., Suma, N., Baglari, H., & Singh, P. (2019). Urban and rural pattern of Internet use among youth and its association with mood state. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 8(8), 2602–2606. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_428_19
Ho, R. (2014). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS (2nd ed.). CRC Press.
Hurwitz, L. B., & Schmitt, K. L. (2020). Can children benefit from early internet exposure? Short- and long-term links between internet use, digital skill, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 146, e103750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103750
INEE. (2019). Panorama educativo de México 2018. Indicadores del sistema educativo nacional. Educación básica y media superior [Overview of education in Mexico 2018. National education system indicators. Basic and upper secondary education]. https://www.inee.edu.mx/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/P1B117.pdf'
INEGI. (2022). Encuesta Nacional sobre Disponibilidad y Uso de Tecnologías de la Información en los Hogares 2021. [2021 National Survey on Availability and Use of Information Technologies in Households]. https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/dutih/2021/
Jiang, L. C., Yang, I. M., & Wang, C. (2017). Self-disclosure to parents in emerging adulthood: Examining the roles of perceived parental responsiveness and separation-individuation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(4), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516640603
Jones, L. M., & Mitchell, K. J. (2016). Defining and measuring youth digital citizenship. New Media and Society, 18(9), 2063–2079. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815577797
Kapetanovic, S., Bohlin, M., Skoog, T., & Gerdner A. (2017). Structural relations between sources of parental knowledge, feelings of being overly controlled and risk behaviors in early adolescence. Journal of Family Studies, 26(2), 226–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2017.1367713
Koutamanis, M., Vossen, H. G. M., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). Adolescents’ comments in social media: Why do adolescents receive negative feedback and who is most at risk? Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 486–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.016
Lauricella, A. R., Herdzina, J., & Robb, M. (2020). Early childhood educators’ teaching of digital citizenship competencies. Computers & Education, 158, e103989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103989
Lee, S. J. (2013). Parental restrictive mediation of children’s internet use: Effective for what and for whom? New Media & Society,15(4), 466–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812452412
Lionetti, F., Keijsers, L., Dellagiulia, A., & Pastore, M. (2016). Evidence of factorial validity of parental knowledge, control and solicitation, and adolescent disclosure scales: When the ordered nature of Likert scales matters. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, e941. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00941
Liu, C., Ang, R. P., & Lwin, M. O. (2013). Cognitive, personality, and social factors associated with adolescents’ online personal information disclosure. Journal of Adolescence, 36(4), 629–638. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.03.016
Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children: Full findings and policy implications from the EU Kids Online survey of 9–16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries. EU Kids Online Network. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33731/
Lukavská, K., Hrabec, O., Lukavský, J., Demetrovics, Z., & Király, O. (2022). The associations of adolescent problematic internet use with parenting: A meta-analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 135, e107423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107423
Madrid, E. J., Valdés, A. A., Urías, M., Torres, G. M., & Parra-Pérez, L. G. (2020). Factores asociados al ciberacoso en adolescentes: Una perspectiva ecológico-social [Factors associated with cyberbullying in adolescents: An ecological social perspective]. Perfiles Educativos, 42(167), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2019.167.59128
Martin, F., Hunt, B., Wang, C., & Brooks, E. (2020). Middle school student perception of technology use and digital citizenship practices. Computers in the Schools, 37(3), 196–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2020.1795500
Mesch, G. S. (2018). Parent-child connections on social networking sites and cyberbullying. Youth and Society, 50(8), 1145–1162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X16659685
Mueller, R. O., & Hancock, G. R. (2019). Structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock, L. M. Stapleton, & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (2nd ed., pp. 445–456). Routledge.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2014). Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children’s internet use. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(2), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.782038
Nowell, C., Pfeifer, J., Enticott, P., Silk, T., & Vijayakumar, N. (2022). Value of self-disclosure to parents and peers during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 33(1), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12803
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2022). Internet access (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/69c2b997-en
Orosco, J. R., & Pomasunco, R. (2020). Adolescentes frente a los riesgos en el uso de las TIC [Adolescents and risks of ICT]. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 22, e17, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2020.22.e17.2298
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Coyne, S. M., & Fraser, A. M. (2012). Getting a high-speed family connection: Associations between family media use and family connection. Family Relations, 61(3), 426–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00710.x
Pastor, Y., García-Jiménez, A., & López-de-Ayala, M.-C. (2022). Estrategias de regulación de uso del smartphone y uso problemático de internet en la adolescencia [Regulatory strategies for smartphone use and problematic internet use in adolescence]. Anales de Psicología, 38(2), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.461771
Pereira, S., Fillol, J., & Moura, P. (2019). El aprendizaje de los jóvenes con medios digitales fuera de la escuela: De lo informal a lo formal [Young people learning from digital media outside of school: The informal meets the formal]. Comunicar, 27(58), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.3916/C58-2019-04
Reise, S., Mansolf, M., & Haviland, M. (2023). Bifactor measurement models. In R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (2nd ed., pp. 329–348). Guilford Press.
Ribble, M. (2015). Digital citizenship in schools: Nine elements all students should know (3rd ed.). International Society for Technology in Education.
Ribble, M., & Bailey, G. (2011). Digital citizenship in schools. International Society for Technology in Education.
Secretaría de Educación Pública (2022). Plan de estudios 2022. Educación básica. [2022 curriculum. Basic education]. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/792397/plan_de_estudio_para_la_educacion_preescolar_primaria_secundaria_2022.pdf
Shin, W., & Kang, H. (2016). Adolescents’ privacy concerns and information disclosure online: The role of parents and the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.062
Skryabin, M., Zhang, J., Liu, L., & Zhang, D. (2015). How the ICT development level and usage influence student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science. Computers & Education, 85, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.004
Smetana, J. G., Villalobos, M., Tasopoulus-Chan, M., Gettman, D. C., & Campione-Barr, N. (2009). Early and middle adolescents' disclosure to parents about activities in different domains. Journal of Adolescence, 32(3), 693–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.010
Son, D., & Padilla-Walker, L. M. (2019). Whereabouts and secrets: A person-centered approach to emerging adults’ routine and self-disclosure to parents. Emerging Adulthood, 9(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696819842718
Steinfeld, N. (2021). Parental mediation of adolescent Internet use: Combining strategies to promote awareness, autonomy and self-regulation in preparing youth for life on the web. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1897–1920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10342-w
Tifferet, S. (2019). Gender differences in privacy tendencies on social network sites: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.046
Vrieze, S. I. (2012). Model selection and psychological theory: A discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychological Methods, 17(2), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027127
Wang, X., & Xing, W. (2018). Exploring the influence of parental involvement and socioeconomic status on teen digital citizenship: A path modeling approach. Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 186–199. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26273879
Widaman, K. F., & Olivera-Aguilar, M. (2023). Investigating measurement invariance using confirmatory factorial analysis. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling (2nd ed., pp. 367–384). Guilford Press.
Downloads
-
HTML
-
PDF
-
XML
-
EPUB
-
ABSTRACT AUDIOSPANISH 322
Article abstract page views: 1323
Published
2024-05-08License
Copyright (c) 2024 José Néstor Peraza-Balderrama, Ángel Alberto Valdés-Cuervo, Lizeth Guadalupe Parra-Pérez, Maricela Urías-Murrieta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.