Research Ethics and Teacher Trainers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2018.20.3.1776Keywords:
Ethics, teachers responsibility, teacher educators, vulnerability.Supporting Agencies:
Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica - UNAM IN300217 y Universidad Pedagógica Nacional - AjuscoAbstract
This paper seeks to construct a particular approach to human research ethics with respect to research practices carried out by teacher trainers and their students in communities in Mexico and Bolivia. It presents the theoretical elements of research ethics and the categories generated on the basis of answers from 79 teacher trainers to an open question on protective factors that should be considered with regard to study participants. The question is part of a qualitative questionnaire administered between March and June 2015. The study concludes that when asked about protective factors, teachers are able to clearly state key aspects of research ethics, although their core focus is on training new basiclevel education teachers.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Australian Government, National Health and Medical Research Council (2016). Section 1: Values and principles of ethical conduct and chapter 2.1 Risk and benefit. Recuperado de https://msd.unimelb.edu.au/sites/default/files/docs/e72_national_statement_march_2014_140331.pdf
Beauchamp, T. y Childress, J. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5a. ed.). Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Código de Núremberg (1989). Ética médica (J. A. Mainetti, trad.). Argentina. (Obra original publicada en 1947). Recuperado de http://www.bioeticanet.info/documentos/Nuremberg.pdf
Coffey, A. y Atkinson, P. (2003). Encontrar el sentido a los datos cualitativos. Estrategias complementarias de investigación. Colombia: Universidad de Antioquia.
Hammersley, M. y Traianou, A. (2014). An alternative ethics? Justice and care as guiding principles for qualitative research. Sociological Research Online, 19(3), 24.
Loue, S., Comité Central de Bioética y Molina, D. P. (2015). Las consideraciones éticas sobre la vulnerabilidad en la investigación cualitativa. Revista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública, 33. Recuperado de http://aprendeenlinea.udea.edu.co/revistas/index.php/fnsp/article/view/24545/20779953
Matthew, D. y Sutton, C. (2011). Being ethical. En D. Matthew y C. Sutton (Eds.), Social research. An introduction (pp. 29-53). Londres: Sage.
National Bioethics Advisory Commission (2001). Ethical and policy issues in research involving human participation (Vol. 1). Recuperado de https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/nbac/human/overvol1.pdf
Organización Mundial de la Salud y Organización Panamericana de la Salud (2012). Capítulo III Pautas y orientación dirigidas a los miembros de los comités de ética de la investigación. Pautas y orientación operativa para la revisión ética de la investigación en salud con seres humanos, pp. 11-16. Recuperado de http://www.paho.org/hq/+index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=22738&Itemid=270
Resnik, D. (2016). What is Ethics in Research & Why is it important? National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Recuperado de https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/
Shamoo, A. y Resnik, D. (2009). Responsible Conduct of Research [Second Edition], USA – New York, Oxford University Press.
The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Office of the Secretary (1979). The Belmont Report. Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Recuperado de https://videocast.nih.gov/pdf/ohrp_belmont_report.pdf
Walton, N. (2016). What is Research Ethics? Recuperado de https://researchethics.ca/what-is-research-ethics/
Work Group for Community Health and Development at the University of Kansas (2016). Chapter 19, Section 2. Understanding risk and protective factors: their use in selecting potential targets and promising strategies for intervention. Recuperado de http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/ choose-and-adapt-community-interventions/risk-and-protective-factors/main
Beauchamp, T. y Childress, J. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5a. ed.). Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Código de Núremberg (1989). Ética médica (J. A. Mainetti, trad.). Argentina. (Obra original publicada en 1947). Recuperado de http://www.bioeticanet.info/documentos/Nuremberg.pdf
Coffey, A. y Atkinson, P. (2003). Encontrar el sentido a los datos cualitativos. Estrategias complementarias de investigación. Colombia: Universidad de Antioquia.
Hammersley, M. y Traianou, A. (2014). An alternative ethics? Justice and care as guiding principles for qualitative research. Sociological Research Online, 19(3), 24.
Loue, S., Comité Central de Bioética y Molina, D. P. (2015). Las consideraciones éticas sobre la vulnerabilidad en la investigación cualitativa. Revista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública, 33. Recuperado de http://aprendeenlinea.udea.edu.co/revistas/index.php/fnsp/article/view/24545/20779953
Matthew, D. y Sutton, C. (2011). Being ethical. En D. Matthew y C. Sutton (Eds.), Social research. An introduction (pp. 29-53). Londres: Sage.
National Bioethics Advisory Commission (2001). Ethical and policy issues in research involving human participation (Vol. 1). Recuperado de https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/nbac/human/overvol1.pdf
Organización Mundial de la Salud y Organización Panamericana de la Salud (2012). Capítulo III Pautas y orientación dirigidas a los miembros de los comités de ética de la investigación. Pautas y orientación operativa para la revisión ética de la investigación en salud con seres humanos, pp. 11-16. Recuperado de http://www.paho.org/hq/+index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=22738&Itemid=270
Resnik, D. (2016). What is Ethics in Research & Why is it important? National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Recuperado de https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/
Shamoo, A. y Resnik, D. (2009). Responsible Conduct of Research [Second Edition], USA – New York, Oxford University Press.
The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Office of the Secretary (1979). The Belmont Report. Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Recuperado de https://videocast.nih.gov/pdf/ohrp_belmont_report.pdf
Walton, N. (2016). What is Research Ethics? Recuperado de https://researchethics.ca/what-is-research-ethics/
Work Group for Community Health and Development at the University of Kansas (2016). Chapter 19, Section 2. Understanding risk and protective factors: their use in selecting potential targets and promising strategies for intervention. Recuperado de http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/ choose-and-adapt-community-interventions/risk-and-protective-factors/main
Downloads
-
HTML
-
PDF
-
XMLSPANISH 79
Article abstract page views: 5266
Published
2018-09-07
