ICT Appropriation by Mexican Students Whose Parents are Professionals

Djamel Toudert

doi:10.24320/redie.2026.28.e01.7239

Autores

Djamel Toudert El Colegio de la Frontera Norte https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2833-4128

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2026.28.e01.7239

Palabras clave:

educación de los padres, TIC, transferencia de tecnología, gestión educativa

Resumen

Este estudio examina la incidencia de la ocupación de los padres sobre el dominio de las TIC por sus hijos en México y destaca su importancia para el éxito académico y la integración social en un entorno educativo digitalizado. Se utilizan datos de PISA de 2018 para analizar las respuestas de 1,043 estudiantes que cuentan con al menos un padre profesional. Al centrarse en padres profesionales que son usuarios intensivos de las TIC, el estudio busca identificar los factores sociales y culturales que influyen en el proceso de transferencia a los hijos. La investigación emplea el modelado de ecuaciones estructurales de mínimos cuadrados parciales (PLS-SEM) para validar un constructo de segundo orden que integra la frecuencia y el uso de las TIC, las habilidades y la autonomía en el uso de las TIC y las TIC como tema en la interacción social. Este enfoque metodológico permite un análisis matizado de las relaciones entre estos constructos y su impacto sobre el dominio de las TIC por parte de los hijos. Además, se analizan variaciones basadas en diferentes combinaciones en las que uno de los padres es profesional y el otro ejerce otro tipo de ocupación, lo cual pone de relieve un efecto de género en el apoyo doméstico de los hijos, moderado por la división por género del uso de las TIC en entornos laborales y la evolución de los patrones de crianza. Este enfoque basado en las ocupaciones y aplicado a los procesos de adquisición, pocas veces abordado por la investigación, ofrece unos aspectos originales para la reflexión y la acción.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Antonoplis, S. (2022). Studying socioeconomic status: Conceptual problems and an alternative path forward. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(2), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221093615

Avvisati, F. (2020). The measure of socio-economic status in PISA: A review and some suggested improvements. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 8(8), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-020-00086-x

Becker, J.-M., Cheah, J.-H., Gholamzade, R., Ringle, C. M. and Sarstedt, M. (2023). PLS-SEM’s most wanted guidance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(1), 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2022-0474

Becker, J.-M., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning, 45(5-6), 359–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.10.001

Caparrós, A. (2021). ICTs usage and skills matching at work: Some evidence from Spain. International Journal of Manpower, 42(6), 1064–1083. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-03-2020-0103

Chen, B.-C., Wu, Y.-T., & Chuang, Y.-T. (2024). The impact of teachers’ perceived competence in information and communication technology usage, and workplace anxiety on well-being, as mediated by emotional exhaustion. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1404575. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1404575

Chiao, C., & Chiu, C.-H. (2018). The mediating effect of ICT usage on the relationship between students’ socioeconomic status and achievement. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27, 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0370-9

Chiu, M.-S. (2020). Exploring models for increasing the effects of school information and communication technology use on learning outcomes through outside-school use and socioeconomic status mediation: The Ecological Techno-Process. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 413–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09707-x

Correa, T., Pavez, I., & Contreras, J. (2020). Digital inclusion through mobile phones?: A comparison between mobile-only and computer users in internet access, skills and use. Information, Communication & Society, 23(7), 1074–1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1555270

Diogo, A. M., Silva, P., & Viana, J. (2018). Children’s use of ICT, family mediation, and social inequalities. Issues in Educational Research, 28(1), 61–76. http://www.iier.org.au/iier28/diogo.pdf

Dodel, M. (2015). E‐skill’s effect on occupational attainment: A PISA‐based panel study. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 69(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2015.tb00497.x

Gómez, N., Tobarra, M.-Á., & López, L. -A. (2014). Employment opportunities in Spain: Gender differences by education and ICT usage. Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, 14(3), 105–130. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eaa/eerese/v14y2014i3_7.html

Granato, S., & Schnepf, S. V. (2025). Why are lower socioeconomic background students underrepresented in Erasmus? A focus on the selection into mobility and degree course organization. Studies in Higher Education, 50(3), 638–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2349963

Gruchel, N., Kurock, R., Bonanati, S., & Buhl, H. M. (2024). Children’s information-related internet use at home: The role of the quantity and quality of parental support and children’s motivation. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 39(3), 512–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2024.2376099

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Hark, N. (2023). Views of parents on digital parenting competencies. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 5(3), 452–474. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.500

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hong, J., Liu, W., & Zhang, Q. (2024). Closing the digital divide: The impact of teachers’ ICT use on student achievement in China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 52(3), 697–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2024.06.003

Hori, R., & Fujii, M. (2021). Impact of using ICT for learning purposes on self-efficacy and persistence: Evidence from PISA 2018. Sustainability, 13(11), 6463. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116463

Hübner, N., Fahrbach, T., Lachner, A., & Scherer, R. (2023). What predicts students’ future ICT literacy? Evidence from a large-scale study conducted in different stages of secondary school. Computers & Education, 203, 104847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104847

International Labour Organization. (2023). The International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-08. Department of Statistics. ILO.

Keen, C., & France, A. (2024). Capital gains in a digital society: Exploring how familial habitus shapes digital dispositions and outcomes in three families from Aotearoa, New Zealand. New Media & Society, 26(8), 4554–4571. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221122228

Kunina-Habenicht, O., & Goldhammer, F. (2020). ICT Engagement: A new construct and its assessment in PISA 2015. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 8, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-020-00084-z

Li, S. C., & Zhu, J. (2023). Cognitive-motivational engagement in ICT mediates the effect of ICT use on academic achievements: Evidence from 52 countries. Computers & Education, 204, 104871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104871

Loh, R. S. M., Kraaykamp, G., & van Hek, M. (2023). Student ICT resources and intergenerational transmission of educational inequality: Testing implications of a reproduction and mobility perspective. European Sociological Review, 39(5), 804–819. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcad008

Ma, Y., & Qin, X. (2021). Measurement invariance of information, communication and technology (ICT) engagement and its relationship with student academic literacy: Evidence from PISA 2018. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100982

Matthews, L. (2017). Applying multigroup analysis in PLS-SEM: A step-by-step process. In E. H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares path modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications (pp. 219–243). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_10

Micheli, M. (2015). What is new in the digital divide? Understanding internet use by teenagers from different social backgrounds. In E. L. Robinson, S. R. Cotten, J. Schulz, T. M. Hale, & A. Williams (Eds.), Studies in Media and Communications (Vol. 10, pp. 55–87). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010003

Nico, M. (2021). Identity and change of a field: A literature analysis of the concept of social mobility. Social Science Information, 60(3), 457-478. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184211022178

Ojo, A. O., Arasanmi, C. N., Raman, M., & Tan, C. N.-L. (2019). Ability, motivation, opportunity and sociodemographic determinants of Internet usage in Malaysia. Information Development, 35(5), 819–830. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666918804859

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). A note about Spain in PISA 2018.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). PISA 2018 technical background.

Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., Panigrahi, P. K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). Role of internet self-efficacy and interactions on blended learning effectiveness. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 62(6), 1239–1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2021.2004565

Qazi, A., Hasan, N., Abayomi-Alli, O., Hardaker, G., Scherer, R., Sarker, Y., Kumar, S., & Maitama, J. Z. (2022). Gender differences in information and communication technology use & skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 4225–4258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10775-x

Ragnedda, M. (2017). The third digital divide: A Weberian approach to digital inequalities. Routledge.

Ren, W., Zhu, X., & Yang, J. (2022). The SES-based difference of adolescents’ digital skills and usages: An explanation from family cultural capital. Computers & Education, 177, 104382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104382

Scheerder, A., van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1607–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007

Scherer, R., & Siddiq, F. (2019). The relation between students’ socioeconomic status and ICT literacy: Findings from a meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 138, 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.011

Silva, P., Diogo, A. M., Coelho, C., Fernandes, C., & Viana, J. (2015). Children’s practices of ICT and social inequalities: On the uses of the Magalhães computer in two school communities. In S. Pereira (Ed.), Digital Literacy, Technology and Social Inclusion (pp. 345–375). Húmus.

Toudert, D. (2024). Accesibilidad digital: Sensibilidad al tamaño de localidades y los estratos socioeconómicos en México [Digital accessibility: Sensitivity to city size and socioeconomic strata in Mexico]. Empiria. Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, (61), 15–39. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.61.2024.41279

Toudert, D. (2025). Brecha digital: relato de una guerra perdida [Digital divide: The story of a lost war]. El Colegio de la Frontera Norte. https://doi.org/10.33679/CFN.9786074796018

United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2012). International Standard Classification of Education ISCED 2011. Institute for Statistics. UNESCO.

Weber, M., & Becker, B. (2019). Browsing the web for school: Social inequality in adolescents’ school-related use of the internet. Sage Open, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019859955

Wright, E. (2005). Approaches to class analysis (Ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Yates, S., & Lockley, E. (2018). Social media and social class. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(9), 1291–1316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218773821

Yuen, A. H., Park, J., Chen, L., & Cheng, M. (2018). The significance of cultural capital and parental mediation for digital inequity. New Media & Society, 20(2), 599–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816667084

Zelalem, A., Melesse, S., & Seifu, A. (2022). Teacher educators’ self-efficacy and perceived practices of differentiated instruction in Ethiopian primary teacher education programs: Teacher education colleges in Amhara regional state in focus. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2018909. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2018909

Zhang, Y., Cao, H., Zhang, W., & Wang, Y. (2023). How digital skills influence on digital participation in China? The mediating roles of online interpersonal communication and online immersion. Sage Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231218786

Zhao, C., & Chen, B. (2023). ICT in education can improve students’ achievements in rural China: The role of parents, educators and authorities. Journal of Policy Modeling, 45(2), 320–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2023.02.007