Vínculo universidad y sociedad: una nueva perspectiva
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2024.26.e16.5147Palabras clave:
desarrollo regional, cooperación económica, enseñanza superior, modelo matemáticoResumen
Esta investigación analiza la influencia de la organización universitaria sobre los logros obtenidos por la vinculación empresarial y el involucramiento regional con el objetivo de aportar conocimiento sobre la relación efectiva que debe existir entre universidad y sociedad. En el estudio empírico participaron investigadores de 51 universidades acreditadas de Colombia. La investigación utilizó un enfoque cuantitativo, con un alcance explicativo a través del modelado de ecuaciones estructurales por covarianzas, a través del cual se comprueba la hipótesis planteada. Los resultados muestran que en el modelo de innovación universitario propuesto, los cuatro factores integrados (liderazgo estratégico, soporte administrativo, estructura universitaria y participación académica) en la variable organización para el involucramiento influyen de manera positiva tanto en el involucramiento regional como en la vinculación empresarial. El estudio puede servir de base para futuras investigaciones que incluyan a universidades no acreditadas e instituciones de carácter técnica o tecnológica.
Descargas
Referencias
Benneworth, P., Pinheiro, R. y Karlsen, J. (2017). Strategic agency and institutional change: investigating the role of universities in regional innovation systems (RISs). Regional Studies, 51(2), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1215599
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables (Vol. 210). John Wiley & Sons.
Bolzani, D., Munari, F., Rasmussen, E. y Toschi, L. (2021). Technology transfer offices as providers of science and technology entrepreneurship education. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46, 335–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09788-4
Bozeman, B. y Sarewitz, D. (2011). Public value mapping and science policy evaluation. Minerva, 49(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-011-9161-7
Charles, D. y Conway, C. (december 2001). Higher education-business interaction survey. A report to the UK HE funding bodies (HEFCE, SHEFC, HEFCW and DEL) and the Office of Science and Technology. Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies (CURDS) University of Newcastle upon Tyne. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246375581
Cherrington, A. M., Scheckle, E., Khau, M., De Lange, N. y Du Plessis, A. (2019). What does it mean to be an ‘engaged university’? Reflections from a university and school-community engagement project. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 14(2), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197918779945
Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation (Issues in Higher Education). Oxford.
Curran, P. J., West, S. G. y Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16
de Souza, O. C., Kipnis, B. y Rodrigues, W. S. (2017). Features of adaptive complex systems in the management practices of open university in Brazil. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences, 4(2), 2349–5219. https://bit.ly/3aYGMFM
D’ Este, P., Castro, E. y Molas, J. (2014). Documento de base para un “Manual de indicadores de vinculación de la universidad con el entorno socioeconómico” (Manual de Valencia). Ingenio CSIC-UPV. https://digital.csic.es/handle/10261/132865
Dedehayir, O., Ortt, J. R. y Seppänen, M. (2017). Disruptive change and the reconfiguration of innovation ecosystems. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 12(3), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242017000300002
de Vincenzi, R. (2020). Gobernanza 4.0 en la educación superior. Debate universitario, 8(16).
Etzkowitz, H. (2017). Innovation Lodestar: The entrepreneurial university in a stellar knowledge firmament. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.026
Farh, J. L., Hoffman, R. C. y Hegarty, W. H. (1984). Assessing environmental scanning at the subunit level: A multitrait‐multimethod analysis. Decision Sciences, 15(2), 197-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1984.tb01209.x
Gánga-Contreras, F., Pérez, A. y Mansilla, J. (2018). Paradigmas emergentes en la gobernanza universitaria: una aproximación teórica. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 23(83), 123-136. https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/utopia/article/view/33331
Gaskin, J. (2016), "Name of plugin or estimand", Gaskination's Statistics. http://statwiki.gaskination.com
Gregorutti, G. (2014). Buscando modelos alternativos para la gestión universitaria latinoamericana. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 66(1), 123-135. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/BORDON/article/view/Bordon.2014.66108
Guerrero, M. y Urbano, D. (2017). The impact of triple helix agents on entrepreneurial innovations’ performance: An inside look at enterprises located in an emerging economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.015
Gümüsay, A. A. y Bohné, T. M. (2018). Individual and organizational inhibitors to the development of entrepreneurial competencies in universities. Research Policy, 47(2), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.11.008
Hair Jr, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L. y Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624
Hayter, C. S. y Cahoy, D. R. (2018). Toward a strategic view of higher education social responsibilities: A dynamic capabilities approach. Strategic Organization, 16(1), 12–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016680564
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. y Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hernández-Sampieri, R. y Torres, C. P. M. (2018). Metodología de la investigación (Vol. 4). McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
Hossain, N. U. I., Dayarathna, V. L., Nagahi, M. y Jaradat, R. (2020). Systems thinking: A review and bibliometric analysis. Systems, 8(3), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems8030023
Hu, L. y Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hughes, A. y Kitson, M. (2012). Pathways to impact and the strategic role of universities: new evidence on the breadth and depth of university knowledge exchange in the UK and the factors constraining its development. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(3), 723-750. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bes017
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford.
Ley 30 (1992). Publicada en el Diario Oficial 40.700 de diciembre 29 de 1992. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=253
Markuerkiaga, L., Igartua, J. I. y Errasti, N. (2018). A performance-based taxonomy of entrepreneurial universities. International Journal of Technology Management, 77(1-3), 57-85. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2018.091713
Marshall, S. J. (2018). Shaping the university of the future. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-981-10-7620-6
Meissner, D. y Shmatko, N. (2017). “Keep open”: the potential of gatekeepers for the aligning universities to the new Knowledge Triangle. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 191-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.012
Morales, S. T. y Giraldo, A. (2015). Análisis de una innovación social: el Comité Universidad Empresa Estado del Departamento de Antioquia (Colombia) y su funcionamiento como mecanismo de interacción. Innovar, 25(56), 141–152. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/48996
Nelles, J. y Vorley, T. (2010). Constructing an entrepreneurial architecture: An emergent framework for studying the contemporary university beyond the entrepreneurial turn. Innovative Higher Education, 35, 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-009-9130-3
Pawłowski, K. (2009). The “fourth generation university” as a creator of the local and regional development. Higher Education in Europe, 34(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720902747017
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’ Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A. y Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
Pineda, J. A., Helmsing, A. H. J. y Saldías, C. (2017). Universidad y desarrollo regional. Aportes del Cider en sus 40 años. Ediciones Uniandes-Universidad de los Andes.
Rodríguez, S. (2018). La Universidad: una visión desde “fuera” orientada al futuro. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 36(1), 15-38. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.36.1.309041
Ruoppila, S. y Zhao, F. (2017). The role of universities in developing China’s university towns: The case of Songjiang university town in Shanghai. Cities, 69, 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.05.011
Salomaa, M. (2019). Third mission and regional context: assessing universities’ entrepreneurial architecture in rural regions. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 6(1), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2019.1586574
Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. y Benneworth, P. (2019). Is the entrepreneurial university also regionally engaged? Analysing the influence of university’s structural configuration on third mission performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.017
Sengupta, A. y Ray, A. S. (2017). Choice of Structure, business model and portfolio: Organizational models of knowledge transfer offices in british universities. British Journal of Management, 28(4), 687–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12224
Shahraki, A. A. (2019). Sustainable regional development through knowledge networks: Review of case studies. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 8(4), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.04.004
Sturniolo, S. A. (2010). Lo local/territorial como transducción en el vínculo universidad-sociedad [Tesis doctoral], Universidad de Buenos Aires. http://repositorio.filo.uba.ar/handle/filodigital/1646
Talebzadehhosseini, S., Garibay, I., Keathley-Herring, H., Al-Rawahi, Z. R. S., Garibay, O. O. y Woodell, J. K. (2019). Strategies to enhance university economic engagement: evidence from US universities. Studies in Higher Education, 46(6), 1112-1131. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672645
Vera, P. H. (2017). Los factores organizativos como determinantes del impacto de la cooperación con empresas. Un estudio en universidades latinoamericanas [Tesis doctoral, Universidad Complutense de Madrid]. https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/40850/
Wen, J. R., Cheng, K. M., Chen, C. P. y Hsieh, Y. H. (2014). Inspecting the theoretical model of junior high school students' learning in english village with structural equation modeling. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 100-114. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1018231
Williams, A., Kennedy, S., Philipp, F. y Whiteman, G. (2017). Systems thinking: A review of sustainability management research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 866–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.002
Youtie, J. y Shapira, P. (2008). Building an innovation hub: A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development. Research Policy, 37(8), 1188–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.012
Zhou, R. y Tang, P. (2020). The role of university knowledge transfer offices: Not just commercialize research outputs! Technovation, 90–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102100
Descargas
-
HTML
-
PDFESPAÑOL 4
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo: 44
Publicado
2024-12-19Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Samuel Prieto, Elva Esther Vargas Martínez, Juan Manuel Montes Hincapié, John Alexander Taborda Giraldo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
